Liverpool bomber’s failed asylum claim raises tough questions for Home Office

The Government department has repeatedly refused to explain why Emad Al Swealmeen was not removed from the UK once his claim and appeal were rejected.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Liverpool Women’s Hospital bomber Emad Al Swealmeen had an asylum claim dismissed more than six years before he tried to carry out the attack.

The information revealed in newly obtained court documents raises fresh questions for the Home Office.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Al Swealmeen died from the blast and subsequent fire after his homemade bomb detonated in a taxi outside the hospital shortly before 11.00 on Sunday, 14 November.

His inquest revealed he bought 2,000 ball bearings and rented a property in Liverpool as "bomb-making factory" to manufacture a device with "murderous intent".

Taxi driver David Perry escaped his cab before it burst into flames an nobody else died in the blast.

Emad al-Swealmeen pictured at Speke Hall in April 2017. Image: Facebook/Malcolm HitchcottEmad al-Swealmeen pictured at Speke Hall in April 2017. Image: Facebook/Malcolm Hitchcott
Emad al-Swealmeen pictured at Speke Hall in April 2017. Image: Facebook/Malcolm Hitchcott

False asylum applications

The Iraqi-born 32-year-old falsely claimed to be of Syrian heritage in asylum applications. He came to the UK in May 2014 legally, with a Jordanian passport and UK visa but his asylum claim was rejected, a coroner’s court heard last month.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He challenged the Home Office decision by lodging an appeal with the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) but this was dismissed in 2015, a copy of the ruling obtained following requests from the BBC - supported by the PA news agency - and The Times show.

The decision dated April 16 of that year, after a hearing in Manchester three days earlier, detailed how Al Swealmeen had been diagnosed with depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Home Office officials decided he had not established a "well-founded fear of persecution so that he did not qualify for asylum" and had not demonstrated "substantial grounds" to qualify for humanitarian protection.

He had been informed of the "decision to remove him from the United Kingdom", the court papers said.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The judge noted there were "a number of problems" with his evidence and, considering Al Swealmeen’s credibility, said: "I find that the appellant has attempted to give an account to put himself in the best light ...

"In view of all the evidence, I reject his account of events in Syria and his fears on his return in their entirety, and dismiss his asylum appeal."

Al Swealmeen did not attend the hearing. The solicitors initially representing him had withdrawn from the case and asked to be removed from the record.

Al Swealmeen’s chequered history

Born in Baghdad, he had been in prison in the Middle East for a serious assault, as well as being convicted previously in Liverpool of possession of an offensive weapon. Al Swealmeen was still a practising Muslim despite converting to Christianity once in the UK, the coroner’s court was told.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He lived at Home Office-provided accommodation in Sutcliffe Street, in the Kensington area of Liverpool, but since April had rented a self-contained flat in Rutland Avenue, the inquest heard.

Police activity in Rutland Avenue in Sefton Park, after an explosion at the Liverpool Women's Hospital killed one person and injured another on Sunday. Picture: Peter Byrne/PA WirePolice activity in Rutland Avenue in Sefton Park, after an explosion at the Liverpool Women's Hospital killed one person and injured another on Sunday. Picture: Peter Byrne/PA Wire
Police activity in Rutland Avenue in Sefton Park, after an explosion at the Liverpool Women's Hospital killed one person and injured another on Sunday. Picture: Peter Byrne/PA Wire

Officials confirmed that in January last year Al Swealmeen launched another first-tier tribunal appeal which was still outstanding at the time of the attack, suggesting he had recently submitted a fresh asylum claim to the Home Office which had also been rejected.

The department has repeatedly refused to answer questions about the case or explain why Al Swealmeen was not removed from the UK once his asylum claim, and subsequent appeal, was rejected.

What’s been said

When contacted, the Home Office said it was "fixing the broken asylum system" and that the "New Plan for Immigration will require people to raise all protection-related issues up front to tackle the practice of making multiple and sequential claims and enable the removal of those with no right to be in our country more quickly".

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

A spokesman would not comment on whether the Home Office was conducting carrying out an internal inquiry, or conducting any investigations, into how the case was handled.

Decisions made by the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) are not normally reported. But, after requests for the records were made by the press, the tribunal’s president Judge Michael Clements accepted that in this instance the "public interest element is such that this outweighs the usual practice".

Related topics: